Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 18:24
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
A Sleep Expert Says It's OK To Use Your Phone In Bed For A Surprising Reason - Bustle
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Gina Ortiz Jones, a Progressive, Is Elected San Antonio’s Mayor - The New York Times
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Every Hideo Kojima Game Ranked - IGN
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
When you have seven hours to kill, what should one do?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
As a Chinese, what disgusts you about the Chinese society today?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Northern Lights Alert: 8 States May See Aurora Borealis Monday Night - Forbes
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The workout supplement becoming more popular outside the gym - WTOP
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Housing market tide is turning as home prices fall in top cities - Fortune
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear: